3 Things Auto Insurers Don't Want You to Know About Your Whiplash Injury!

Most people in car crashes suffer some type of soft tissue injury.  Soft tissue injuries are injuries to the muscles, ligaments, and tendons in the body.  Whiplash is a type of soft tissue or bony injury to the neck or brainstem caused by the sudden back and forth movement of the neck. These injure typically occur in rear end or side impact car crashes.  That movement rips, tears, and stretches the soft tissue in the neck, and can cause more severe injuries.  Some soft tissue injuries are minor and don't warrant medical treatment, while others can take months or years to heal.  Some soft tissue and whiplash injuries are permanent and may require surgical interventions.  Although these injuries are serious injuries, insurers regularly discount them.   Here are some things you should know about whiplash injuries that insurance companies don't want you to know:

1) Whiplash Injuries Are The Most Common Injury Associated with Motor Vehicle Crashes:  Insurers often discount claims of whiplash as malingering (making an injury up with the purpose of obtaining an award) or somatoform disorder (psychological issues causing physical symptoms).  They attempt to convince the injured person that they couldn't have suffered an injury that lasted for as long as it did.  Insurers for the bad driver often make the injured person feel as if they are the only person to have whiplash symptoms last as long as they did or were as severe as they were.  This is an effort to attempt to convince the injured person that the crash could not have injured them. However, the insurer is wrong.  Whiplash injuries are not unique.  In fact, up to 83% of people involved in a car crash suffer from whiplash injuries.   Medical studies have shown these are real injuries that can dramatically impact a person's life and health.

2) Whiplash Injuries Do Not Typically Show Up on an X-Ray:  Insurance adjusters will often note that the Emergency Room X-Rays of the neck are unremarkable and do not show any evidence of injury.  Adjusters may attempt to convince the injured person that the crash didn't cause a whiplash injury because there is not any "objective" evidence of it (think X-Ray, or broken bone, misalignment of bones, etc.).  However, studies show  X-Rays do not typically show soft tissue injuries to the neck and whiplash type injuries.  However, MRI studies may show the soft tissue and whiplash type injuries.  However, MRI's may come with their own problems of high false positive results, and cannot see all pain associated lesions.  CT scans may be able to show some, but not all whiplash injuries.  However, they are costly and are not always readily available.  Other tests may not show injury.  This information is important because adjusters know that the injuries are real, but technology may not show these injuries.   A medical provider (Doctor, Osteopath, or Chiropractor) can diagnose whiplash injuries based on other objective findings without the need for imaging.   Insurers know this, but may try and convince you otherwise. 

3) Whiplash Injuries Can Be Permanent:  Insurance adjusters commonly say that the crash caused whiplash injury should have healed within 12 to 16 weeks.  They explain the lingering pain on "pre-existing" or age-related conditions. However, this ignores the science and studies that have shown that there is no scientific basis to assert whiplash injuries do not lead to chronic pain or permanent injuries.  These are real injuries that can be permanent. 

Hopefully, this information will assist you in combating an insurance agent to assist you in obtaining maximum compensation for your injuries.  However, if you are unsuccessful efforts or have questions for a personal injury lawyer, call Jeremiah Ross at 503.224.1658 for your free personal injury consultations. Ross Law PDX represents personal injury clients throughout Portland and Oregon.  PLEASE ASK A DOCTOR ABOUT YOUR WHIPLASH INJURY.  This post is meant for information purposes only and SHOULD NOT be RELIED UPON as or construed as medical advice, or legal advice.   Please remember that every injury is different and all legal cases are different.   

Crash on Powell This Morning Was a Needless Rear-End Crash

My morning commute is often exciting.  My two kids in the back seat keep things entertaining and energetic for my wife and I.  This morning there was some additional excitement in the commute.  A car rear-ended a truck on Powell Blvd.  The vehicle occupants did not appear to have any catastrophic injuries.  However, this is a classic rear-end crash where soft tissue and whiplash-type symptoms will arise after the adrenaline subsides.  Additionally, Concussions and Mild TBI's are common with these crashes. These crashes are completely avoidable if drivers pay attention, eliminate distractions, drive at a safe distance from the car in front of them and drive at a safe speed.

If you or someone you know has been injured in a car crash in Oregon call Jeremiah Ross at 503.224.1658 for your free case evaluation.   Ross Law PDX is happy to assist personal injury clients in obtaining compensation for their injuries. BTW:  My wife took the photo while I was driving.  

Distracted Driving Kills, But Should We Have a Law Outlawing Eating and Driving?

As a personal injury attorney I am constantly exposed to the gruesome consequences of distracted driving.  My clients are typically injured by someone that is driving and not paying attention.  These injuries can range from bruises, soft tissue and whiplash type of injuries to serious catastrophic injuries that require hospitalization, surgery, and months of rehabilitation.   I never get to meet some clients because they were killed by the negligence of another.

With that said, there is an interesting law being proposed in New Jersey to attempt to outlaw anything that can result in unsafe driving.  I have not seen the text of the bill, but reports note that it is aimed with outlawing a driver from participating in any activity that is unrelated to the safe operation of a motor-vehicle. Lawmakers are attempting to make roads safer by outlawing things like shaving and driving, putting make-up on while driving, watching a movie on a ipad while driving, and all of the various other distracting things people do while driving. Depending on the language of the law, it may be challenged on Constitutional grounds for being over-broad. 

A compilation of teen driver vehicle crashes caused by driver distraction.

In any event, I agree with the spirit of the law, but have concerns about its Constitutionality and the power it may provide law enforcement.  Distracted driving is an issue that needs to be addressed.  An article noted that according to the AAA foundation for Traffic Safety, the three main sources of distracted driving are:  

1) Visual (failing to keep a proper lookout)

2) Manual (taking hands off of the wheel)

3) Cognitive (thinking about something else aside from driving)

Those results are in line with the  personal injury cases I see. The AAA study noted that studying whether or not a person is thinking about something aside from driving is the most difficult thing to study.  This seems  fairly obvious, because it is impossible to see into a person's actual thoughts in real time.  For example, it is difficult to prove a person caused a crash because they were day dreaming. 

At the end of the day what does this mean for Oregon drivers?  The data seems to question whether or not these laws are effective.  However, I am sure more studies will pop out of the wood work affirming the validity of these laws.  

I think everyone will agree that texting and driving is unsafe and should be outlawed even if the empirical data from one particular group does not conclude it is.  Should Oregon Law Makers want to eliminate distracted driving, they can probably look to the current Oregon Revised Statutes that outlaw: texting while driving (ORS 811.507), careless driving (ORS 811.135), and reckless driving (ORS 811.140).  Oregon lawmakers may need to decide whether these laws provide a sufficient deterrent to distracting driving.  

Until the lawmakers address the issue, I will be here to hold distracted drivers accountable for the harms and losses they cause to my clients.   If you or a person you know is injured as a result of distracting driving, please call Portland personal injury attorney Jeremiah Ross at 503.224.1658.   Please call Ross Law LLC today for your free personal injury consultation.  

Evolution-Another Way to Prevent Car Crash Injuries and Deaths

Car crashes kill tens of thousands of Americans every year.  Here in Oregon roughly 312 people were killed in Motor Vehicle Crashes in 2015.   According to CBS, Motor Vehicle crashes and other "Accidents"  are the fourth leading cause of death in the united states.  These frightening statistics are why we  spend millions of dollars on trying to make the roads and vehicles safer, but what if there was another way to prevent injuries in car crashes?  It turns out there might be.  We as a species can  evolve to survive car crashes.  

Meet Graham.  Graham has already evolved to survive car crashes.  He looks strange, but he should survive most car crashes. 

Graham is an amazing example of how us humans have evolved to protect our species, but it turns out he isn't real.  Graham was created by the Australian Government to use as a tool to educate people about the dangers of car crashes.  Here are some of his features:

Neck:  The vast majority of my clients suffer some neck injury if they are in a car crash.  In a crash the head keeps on moving while the body stays in place.  This causes the neck to strain and flex in a manner it wasn't  intended to do. This is why most people will have a sore neck for a couple of days after a car crash.   However, some people suffer cracked vertebrae, herniated discs, and it can even break.  A broken spinal column can cause paraplegia or quadriplegia.  Recognizing that the neck was a weak point in the body, Graham evolved to not have a neck anymore. 

Face:  Facial injures can be common.  Their is minimal tissue to absorb impact, so even low impact crashes can result in broken facial bones.   Graham's extra fatty and flat face helps absorb and disperse the energy from an impact.

Skull:  Head injuries are common in car crashes.  Many times the head will suffer trauma from bouncing off of the steering wheel, the side post, or the side window.  This can occur even if the person is seat belted in.   These head injuries can be fatal, as they can damage the brain. Graham has evolved to have a skull shaped like a helmet that will absorb more impact earlier.  He also has "crumple zones" in his head.

Brain:  Brains are tossed around inside your skull in a car crash.  This causes damage to the brain.  Many times this brain damage is irreperable.  Graham has evolved to survive a crash without a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

Ribs:  Ribs are often cracked or strained in a car crash. This is because they absorb much of the energy as the body is pressed against the seat belt in a crash. Broken ribs are very painful, but they can cause serious injuries if they fracture.  Fractured ribs can puncture lungs and other vital organs that can cause serious injury or death.  Graham evolved to have more nipples and fatty tissue around the ribs, so that the chest became an, "airbag instead of armour." 

Graham also has tough thick skin, his knee joints rotate 360 degrees and his feet and ankles are built to survive being hit by a vehicle.  If you want to learn more about Graham and the project go to the link: Meet Graham

If you haven't evolved to survive a car crash and were injured in a car crash, please call Portland Oregon Personal Injury Attorney Jeremiah Ross.  Ross Law LLC is happy to provide you a free personal injury consultation.  Please call 503.224.1658 for your free personal injury consultation.